Post by Anna Fargo from ,,The Curse''

Prompt 6: Beauty and the Beast

The element of magic is what stood out to me the most when comparing the Cocteau’s movie to Beaumont’s version of Beauty and the Beast. In this written version, the merchant father finds an “immense castle,” but the detail of him exploring the “house” makes it sound pretty normal. The way that Beaumont sneaks the element of magic in is by having the father say, “Surely…this palace belongs to some good fairy who has taken pity on me” (34). This conveys that all of the seemingly natural events explained, were actually caused by the supernatural. As for the introduction of the castle, Beaumont downplays the magic. Meanwhile, Cocteau uses the small detail of magic in the castle to create a big dramatic scene for the singing merchant father. There are moving human arms attached to all the candle lights in the hallways that turn on and off according to where the father (or Belle) goes. Similar arms can also be found at the dinner table, serving food, as well as opening curtains for the guest. The music in the background has a mystical and mysterious sound that is also eerie. The creepy statues in the dining room, as well as many other rooms, have heads that move to follow the guest. Their eyes also light up, as if they can see. Another magical aspect is that the horse, Magnificent, somehow knows exactly where to take Belle and the father. As if all of this is not enough, Cocteau emphasizes magic even more when Belle is getting accustomed to the mysterious castle. The doors sing to her to tell her which room is for her, and the mirror sings to give instructions. Also, the bed prepares itself for Belle by pulling back the sheets. Clearly, Cocteau took a fairly small detail that Beaumont kept a bit hidden, and exaggerated to make this part of the story more exhilarating.

Posted by Anna Fargo

Post by Erica D. Santiago from ,,The Curse''

Beauty and The Beast

The Cocteau film version differed greatly from the Beaumont version of Beauty and the Beast by the ways that each dealt with the fate of the evil sisters of Beauty. There is a wrapped up conclusion to the sister's having to be punished for treating Beauty so wickedly by having the fairy transform them into statues and that would be their fate to suffer. While in the film version there was no mention of the sisters by the end of the tale. It did not tie a pretty little bow that described the Beauty seeking revenge upon her sisters that really did not love and care for their father like Beauty did, and were so jealous that Beauty was the most chased after woman that they constantly wanted to see her fail. I just wish that the film would have expressed the fate of the sisters since they did seem like a vital part of the story line itself that it was just odd to not to find out what ended up happening to them by the end.

Posted by Erica D. Santiago

Post by Lydia Ohl from ,,The Mean Giant''

The ending of Cocteau's la belle et la bete has always stuck out to me, especially the image of beauty and the beast flying away. It is a very strange and beautiful image with the billowing fabric is a much more powerful image than returning to the palace. The film cuts our the whole reunion with the family, although it is mentioned that belle will reunite with her father, and her sisters will be demeaned. The lovers fly off in clouds and smoke, embracing and almost dancing, free from their previous restraints; belle's family and the beast's ugliness.

I also particularly like the line that Belle says: c'etais moi le monstre - i was the monster. This places more blame on belle than de beaumont's story. Belle does not apologize for letting his ugliness overweight his kindness. Instead she encourages him to fight for his life and her love, and it becomes a discussion on what a man vs. a beast can do for love- a man can fight, but a beast can only grovel at his love's feet.

There is also the whole added plot line of Avenant, her brother's friend who wants to marry belle, and who belle admits to loving. I have always found it a bit creepy that Avenant and la bete are played by the same actor, but it makes sense that when seen in the plot line that the beast is only turned back into a man when Avenant is kill/transformed. It is interesting that he tells belle that he changed because of a loving look, when the director seems to point to the diana statue shooting Avenant and transferring the curse to another, with the beast taking on Avenant's appearance.

Posted by lydiaohl@me.com

Post by Allison Baschnagel from ,,The Cruel Witch''

Cocteau vs. Beaumont: The Beast

One thing that I noticed in Cocteau's “Beauty and the Beast” that is different than in Beaumont’s version is the way in which the Beast is presented. In Beaumont's version, the beast is described as having such a frightening appearance that it could cause a person to faint. The only characteristics in Beaumont's version that define a beast are his ugliness and his lack of intelligence/wit. In Cocteau's “Beauty and the Beast”, however, the beast is not only presented as being ugly and described as having no wit, but Cocteau also includes scenes and additional dialogue that are not included in Beaumont's version that suggest that the beast behaves more animal-like than human-like at times. For instance, Cocteau includes the scene in which Belle peers out the fence door and sees the Beast messily drinking from the pond like a parched wolf. Cocteau also includes the scene in which the Beast is distracted by a nearby, darting deer, as if he wants to spring at it and devour it. Lastly, Cocteau includes the scene where the Beast is creepily stationed outside of Belle’s room late at night covered in blood. Thus, Cocteau presents the Beast as more of an animal than Beaumont does. Even though the Beast is ugly and dumb in Beaumont’s version, he still always acts like a kind, civilized human being.

Posted by Allison at 8:05 PM

Alex! said...

I also noticed the differences between the two beasts. In having to turn the beast into a visual character, Cocteau had to create his beast from his own imagination. I like how he gave him more of an animal persona than that of a hideous monster.

Tim said...

I think Allison makes a very good observation when discussing the portrayal of the beast in Cocteau's film. I am reminded of what we talked about in class on Tuesday, when we discussed what actually makes a beast and is the beast really a beast? (besides his physical). In the Beaumont version, when the sisters' husbands are being described, one really can see that the so-called "beast" would be a better spouse than them. However, I feel that when the beast is made into an actual animal, some of the social commentary is lost. Just a thought...

Post by Michelle Kim from ,,The Nasty Stepmother''

Cocteau vs. de Beaumont

One difference I noticed between the Cocteau film and de Beaumont's version of Beauty and the Beast was the part of the story where Beauty/Belle goes to take her father's place at the Beast's castle.
In the de Beaumont's version, Belle pleads with her father and brothers to let her go to die instead of her father, and ultimately her father and brothers give in. Even though Belle's father is pretty upset at having to leave her to die in his stead, in the end he leaves her to the mercy of the Beast. However, in Cocteau's version, Beauty mentions that she wants to go to the Beast's castle in place of her father, but before any course of action is decided, the father falls ill and the next day Beauty sneaks out of the house to go to the Beast's castle without her father and brother knowing.

Though this is a relatively minor difference, I still believe it is significant. De Beaumont's version has reader questioning the love Beauty's father has for his daughter - as discussed in class, how can the father just hand over his (favorite) daughter to a Beast? But Cocteau eliminates this predicament altogether. By tweaking the story so that Belle sneaks out without her father knowing, viewers can't really blame the father for being unloving or selfish - Beauty's decision to go to the Beast's castle was out of his hands. Cocteau enables the father to maintain a reputation of being the ultimate loving and caring father - something that is easier for a viewer to understand than a father who allows his own daughter to die in his place.

Posted by Michelle Kim at 2:36 PM

Assignment 6 - 10.March 2009

Pick one scene or element from Cocteau's Beauty and the Beast, and compare it or contrast it with de Beaumont's version. You might pick something that interests you, that seems odd, or something that you missed in one version or the other, for example.

For those of you who didn't manage to, you have time to complete the reading and watch the film, which is available on OAK and also on Reserve in the Library.

Deadline for putting up your responses is 09.00 p.m. on Wednesday.

Deadline for comment on at least one post is 10.00 a.m. on Thursday.